Legal Opinion

Kentucky Unemployment Insurance Commission v. Duro Bag Manufacturing Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 28, 2008No. 2006-CA-002625-MRPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WINE, Judge.

The Kentucky Unemployment Insurance Commission (“Commission”) appeals the Boone Circuit Court’s ruling that Duro Bag Manufacturing Company’s (“Duro”) employee, Donna T. Smith (“Smith”), was fired on August 13, 2004, for misconduct, and therefore is not entitled to unemploy ment benefits. For the reasons herein, we affirm the trial court.

The parties do not dispute that Duro fired Smith, a machine operator, for appearing for work with a blood alcohol level of .047. Smith acknowledged she voluntarily drank eight ounces of whiskey over a six-hour period, allegedly quitting at…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Boynton Cab Co. v. NeubeckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
  2. American Beauty Homes Corp. v. Louisville & Jefferson County Planning & Zoning CommissionCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1964
  3. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Kentucky Unemployment Insurance CommissionCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1969
  4. Kentucky Unemployment Insurance Commission v. KingCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1983
  5. Shamrock Coal Co., Inc. v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kentucky Unemployment Insurance Commission v. CecilKentucky Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Kentucky Unemployment Insurance Commission v. HamiltonKentucky Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Kentucky Unemployment Insurance Commission v. HamiltonKentucky Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Skees v. Kentucky Unemployment Insurance CommissionCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API