Kentucky Unemployment Insurance Commission v. King
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
WHITE, Judge.
This appeal is taken from a judgment of the Boyle Circuit Court by which it was determined that unemployment benefits should not be denied appellee Pamela King.
As a precedent to employment with K-Mart a number of regulations and policies are reviewed with the worker. Under the Personnel Manager’s Checklist heading “Explain rules” is # T: “Friends and relatives when shopping should make purchases from someone other than yourself — eliminate any misunderstandings.” Ms. King signed the form indicating that this and all other K-Mart procedures had been explained to her. Nevertheless,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Kentucky Unemployment Insurance CommissionCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1969
3Cited by18 opinions
- Thompson v. Kentucky Unemployment Insurance CommissionCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2002
- 500 Associates, Inc. v. Natural Resources & Environmental Protection CabinetCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2006
- Johnson v. Galen Health Care, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 2001
- Jones v. Cabinet for Human Resources, Division for Licensure & RegulationsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1986
- Holbrook v. Kentucky Unemployment Insurance CommissionCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2009
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.