Legal Opinion

State v. Bain

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided March 27, 2009No. 2006-327PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReiber, C.J.

¶ 1. Defendant Stephen Bain appeals from district court orders denying his motion to suppress certain evidence obtained after a search of his home and approving the reconstructed trial court record under Vermont Rule of Appellate Procedure 10(c). Defendant challenges his convictions for possession of stolen property and possession of marijuana, as well as his enhanced sentence under the habitual-offender statute. He argues that the recreated record is inadequate for effective and meaningful appellate review, that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress, and that improper jury…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. State v. PelicanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
  3. State v. DePastinoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  4. Robert C. Bransford v. Robert Brown Dale FoltzCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
  5. State v. BrochuSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. FletcherSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
  2. State v. ArringtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
  3. Bain v. Windham County Sheriff Keith ClarkSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
  4. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009
  5. State v. CahillSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API