Legal Opinion

Smith v. . New York and Harlem Railroad Company

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 5, 1859PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The defendant's counsel insists that this case comes within the rule that a servant cannot recover for an injury caused by the negligence of a fellow-servant employed by the same master, in the same general business. The case of the plaintiff differs from the cases to which this rule has been applied in this important fact: the deceased and switch-tender were not employed by the same master. The former was the servant of the New York and New Haven Railroad, and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hegeman v. Western RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1853

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Treadwell v. WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Union Pacific Railway Co. v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Roddy v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  4. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. GossettIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Chicago Terminal Transfer Railroad v. VandenbergIndiana Supreme Court · 1905

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API