Legal Opinion
McCary v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 16, 1965No. Civ. 21876PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAgee, J.
On August 27, 1958, defendant-respondent, referred to herein as the “Company,” issued its insurance policy on the life of Robert L. Me Cary, hereafter referred to as the “Insured.” Attached to the policy and made a separate part thereof is a “Supplementary Provision For Family Income.” The beneficiary under each is the Insured’s wife, who is the plaintiff-appellant herein. A combined monthly premium of $19.50 became due on the 27th day of each month.
The Insured died of cancer on January 13, 1961. The Company contends that the policy and attached supplementary provision had lapsed for…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Posner v. Grunwald-Marx, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1961
- Page v. Washington Mutual Life Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Scott v. Federal Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Turner v. Redwood Mutual Life Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1936
- New York Life Ins. Co. v. WatermanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Pierson v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Ryman v. American National InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Gaunt v. Prudential Insurance of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Robbins v. National Life and Accident Insurance Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1968
- McKeeman v. General American Life InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.