Legal Opinion

Capital Laundry Co. v. Vannozzi

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided December 20, 1933PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The complainant has a laundry business in Trenton. The defendant was employed as one of its route men, to collect and deliver laundry and solicit trade, and, upon taking employment, covenanted that should he resign or be dismissed he would "not engage himself in the laundry business either directly or indirectly or as employe or owner in the city of Trenton for a period of eighteen months thereafter." He quit February 4th, 1933, and since has taken employment with a rival concern, traveling the route, or some part of it, which he served while in the employ of the complainant, and has diverted…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Owl Laundry Co. v. BanksNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1914

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Worrie v. ChristineSupreme Court of Virginia · 1951
  2. Western Maryland Dairy, Inc. v. ChenowithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1942
  3. Foster v. WhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  4. Ridley v. KroutWyoming Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Tolman Laundry, Inc. v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1936

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API