Legal Opinion

Moore v. Moore

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 14, 1939No. 12792PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Justice.

(After stating the foregoing facts.)

“It is an elementary rule of construction, as applied to a pleading, that it is to be construed most strongly against the pleader; and that if an inference unfavorable to the right of a, party claiming a right under such a pleading may be fairly drawn from the facts stated therein, such inference will prevail in determining the rights of the parties.” Krueger v. MacDougald, 148 Ga. 429 (96 S. E. 867). In the instant suit to cancel a deed alleged to have been made by the plaintiff to his wife, since divorced, and their two children, while the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Krueger v. MacDougaldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
  2. Mentone Hotel & Realty Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
  3. West v. WrightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  4. Hill v. MerrittSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  5. Simpson v. KelleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1930

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Company v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
  2. Atlanta Tallow Co. v. John W. Eshelman & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  3. Thomas v. StedhamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
  4. Foy v. ScottSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  5. Spence v. ErwinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API