Legal Opinion

Spence v. Erwin

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 5, 1944No. 14786PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wyatt, Justice.

The controlling question in this case is whether the transaction referred to in the foregoing statement was a sale of the stock by the plaintiffs to the defendants with, an option to-repurchase it from them within a given time for a specified sum of money, or a transaction in which the plaintiffs borrowed money from the defendants and pledged the stock as collateral security. We must look to the petition, as amended, for the answer to this-question. “Whether a given transaction is a sale of land with right to repurchase, or a loan of money with the title to 'the land taken as…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wilkins, Neely & Jones v. GibsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  2. Krueger v. MacDougaldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
  3. Harvard v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  4. James v. MaddoxSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  5. Manget Realty Co. v. Carolina Realty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Spence v. ErwinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  2. Ford Motor Company v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
  3. Knight v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  4. Isaacson v. HouseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1961
  5. E. T. Barwick Mills, Inc. v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API