Legal Opinion

Joseph Ansay, Appellants-Appellees v. Boecking-Berry Equipment Co., a Corporation, Appellant-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided November 22, 1971No. 71-1039, 71-1040PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAM E. DOYLE, Circuit Judge.

The defendant-appellant seeks reversal of a judgment awarding $5,000.00 damages to appellees. The case had to do with the alleged wrongful withholding and occupation by appellant of a tract of land which was subsequently decreed by the Oklahoma courts to have been the property of appellee. Recovery was granted in accordance with an Okla homa statute. 1 Appellant maintains that the Ansays, appellees, were not entitled to any award under the evidence presented because of the dearth of evidence, according to appellant, to establish that there was any use value or…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ohio Oil Co. v. SharpCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1943
  2. State Tax Commission v. United Verde Extension Mining Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1931
  3. La Bruno v. LawrenceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  4. Crow v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  5. Main v. LevineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Osage Wind, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API