Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Fling

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided August 28, 2006No. 04-P-1141PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoerfer, J.

The defendant appeals from his convictions solely on the basis of a purported violation of Mass.R.Crim.P. 36, 378 Mass. 909 (1979). He also appeals from a postjudgment order allowing the Commonwealth’s motion to correct the record pursuant to Mass.R.A.P. 8(e), as amended, 378 Mass. 932 (1979). The question presented by his consolidated appeals is whether the record was properly amended by the taking of evidence to supplement the docket entries to explain the various delays in bringing the matter to trial. The judge did not err in allowing the record to be supplemented, and the amended record…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Barry v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  2. Letch v. DanielsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  3. Commonwealth v. RoblesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  4. Commonwealth v. FarrisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  5. Commonwealth v. SpauldingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DenehyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
  2. Commonwealth v. TaylorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
  3. Commonwealth v. RodgersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
  4. Commonwealth v. BourdonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2008
  5. Commonwealth v. PolancoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API