Commonwealth v. Taylor
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtLenk, J.
The defendant appeals from his conviction of murder in the second degree. He maintains both that a Superior Court judge erred in denying his motion to dismiss for lack of a speedy trial pursuant to Mass. R. Crim. P. 36 (b), as amended, 422 Mass. 1503 (1996), and that errors in the prosecutor’s closing argument require reversal.
As to the speedy trial claim, the judge did not abuse his discretion in denying the defendant’s motion to dismiss under Mass. R. Crim. P. 36, 378 Mass. 909 (1979) (rule 36). A total of 614 calendar days had elapsed between the defendant’s arraignment and the filing of…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Commonwealth v. KozecMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
- Commonwealth v. GrandisonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
- Commonwealth v. CunneenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- United States v. Kenneth S. HastingsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. ShortNebraska Supreme Court · 2021
- Commonwealth v. DiricoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018
- Commonwealth v. GrahamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018
- Wing v. Commissioner of ProbationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
- Commonwealth v. PolancoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.