Legal Opinion
Beckler v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided April 22, 1999No. 1 CA-CV 97-0364PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PATTERSON, Presiding Judge.
¶ 1 State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm) and its insureds (the Becklers) filed cross-motions for summary judgment regarding whether Nebraska or Arizona law applied to stacking of uninsured motorist coverage. The parties stipulated that Arizona law would permit stacking while Nebraska law would not. The trial court ruled that Arizona law applied and State Farm appealed.
*284FACTS
¶ 2 Plaintiffs Charles and Linda Beclder purchased automobile insurance on multiple vehicles from State Farm. Each vehicle was covered by a separate insurance policy.…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Boardman v. United Services Auto. Ass'nMississippi Supreme Court · 1985
- Baybutt Construction Corp. v. Commercial Union InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
- American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus, Georgia, a Georgia Corp. v. United States Fire Company, and Boston Old Colony Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- Bryant v. SilvermanArizona Supreme Court · 1985
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- American States Insurance v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Manterola v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- Bernal v. Charter County Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
- Bristol West Insurance v. WhittDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2005
- Douglas Ex Rel. Douglas v. City & County of DenverColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.