Legal Opinion
Bristol West Insurance v. Whitt
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided August 25, 2005No. 1:04-cv-00036PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
QUIST, District Judge.
In these consolidated cases, Plaintiff in Case No. 5:04-CV-36, Bristol West Insurance Company (“BWIC”), requests that the Court enter a judgment declaring that, among other things, BWIC did not breach any duty to Defendant Carl Lee Whitt (“Dr.Whitt”) under an automobile insurance policy in connection with the August 25, 2002, accident between Dr. Whitt’s automobile and a motorcycle ridden by Defendants Jerry Otto and Angie Otto (the “Ottos”). BWIC also seeks a declaration that it is not bound by a consent judgment entered in a lawsuit in Indiana state court…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Kewin v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bank of Ann Arbor v. Everest National InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- American Guarantee & Liability Insurance v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- Amerisure Mutual Insurance v. Carey Transportation, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2008
- Factory Mutual Insurance Co. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2007
- PENSKE TRUCK LEASING CO., L.P. v. WESTFIELD INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.