Legal Opinion

Hibline v. Prudential Oil Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided May 1, 1923No. 2083PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WADDILL, Circuit Judge.

This is an action of assumpsit brought by the plaintiff in error against the defendant in error, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff and defendant respectively, to recover for commissions claimed to be due plaintiff in connection with sales of petroleum coke made by him for the defendant.

Plaintiff was resident manager at Baltimore of the Quemahoning Coal Company, and in that capacity had been for some years engaged in selling coal for that company, as well as engaged in the sale of “anything else on the side that he desired.” Defendant was engaged in the oil-refining…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Murray v. . BeardNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Little v. PhippsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  3. Quinn v. BurtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  4. Raisin v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1874
  5. Wadsworth v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1891

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gussin v. ShockeyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1989
  2. Straesser-Arnold Co. v. Franklin Sugar Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API