Legal Opinion
Straesser-Arnold Co. v. Franklin Sugar Refining Co.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided May 26, 1925No. 3505PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.
Defendant in error, Franklin Company, brought suit against plaintiff in error, Straesser-Arnold Company, for damages for breach of three contracts for the sale of sugar, dated May 28, June 4, and July 14, 1920, respectively. The defense relied on was the statute of frauds. The defendant introduced no evidence material to the issues, and the. court directed a verdict for Franklin Company for $7,728.38, and entered judgment for that amount. Straesser-Arnold Company sued out this writ and assigned many errors, but with the exception of those relating to the measure of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Franklin Sugar Refining Co. v. HowellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Buhl v. StephensU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana · 1898
- Franklin Sugar Refining Co. v. Kane Milling & Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Brown & Hackney, Inc. v. Rushville Furniture Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1922
- Hibline v. Prudential Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1923
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hamilton Foundry & MacHine Co. v. International Molders & Foundry Workers Union of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1952
- Milliken-Tomlinson Co. v. American Sugar Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1925
- Backus v. TaplinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1936
- Rothenberg v. H. Rothstein & SonsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1949
- Miller-Crenshaw Co. v. Colorado Mill & Elevator Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.