Legal Opinion

Dunston v. Hoptonic Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1890PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Kent. (Burch, J.) Judgment creditors’ bill against a corporation and a portion of the stockholders. Complainant appeals from decree dismissing the bill on demurrer. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

The bill was filed in this cause as a judgment creditors’ bill April 2i, 1889, and on the same day subpoena to appear and answer was duly issued directed to said defendants, returnable May 22, 1889. Subpoena was personally served upon all the defendants except John S. Long, who could not be found, as appears from the return of the sheriff on file in the cause. The cause was heard in the court below upon bill of complaint and demurrers, and the demurrers were sustained. Complainant appeals.

The bill alleges, substantially, that complainant obtained two judgments against the Hoptonic Company,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Adler v. Milwaukee Patent Brick Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Young v. Erie Iron Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Mann v. . PentzNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
  4. Morgan v. New-York & Albany Rail RoadNew York Court of Chancery · 1843
  5. Wellington v. Continental Const. & Imp. Co.New York Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. FarnsworthTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Emanuel v. BarnardNebraska Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Wilson v. California Wine Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Union City Lumber Co. v. Traverse City, Leelanau & Manistique RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API