Legal Opinion
Wilson v. California Wine Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided March 10, 1893PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Appeal from Kent. (Adsit, J.), Judgment creditor’s bill. Complainant appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
In May, 1889, -the defendants Quinn, Cunningham, Redmond, and Ives organized the California Wine Company, Avith a capital stock of $5,000, of Avhich 10 per cent, only Avas paid in. The shares were $25 each. Quinn and Cunningham had 99 shares each, and Redmond and Ives one each.
In July, 1890, the complainant recovered a judgment for *119$194.85 and $3 costs against the California Wine’Company, before a justice of the peace. A transcript of the judgment was filed in the circuit court, and execution issued, and returned unsatisfied-. This bill is filed asking for a receiver for the company, and that…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Dunston v. Hoptonic Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dogan v. MICH. BASIC PROP. INS. ASS'NMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
- Tucker v. EatonMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
- Dogan v. Michigan Basic Property InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983