Legal Opinion

Rio Grande Extension Co. v. Coby

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 15, 1884PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from County Court of El Paso County. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

1 Helm, J.

This-action was brought against the Extension Company by appellee, as assignee and owner of five several instruments of writing known as time checks. The checks, and also certain separate orders relating thereto, were received in evidence over the objections of appellant. There is no claim or proof that these orders were ever presented to or accepted by the company; the judgment, therefore, cannot rest upon them, as no liability on its part thereunder was shown. It must be sustained, if at all, exclusively by the time checks. They are alike in form, and the following example is all…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Moore v. . Metropolitan National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Northern Central Railway Co. v. BastianCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1860
  3. Partridge v. BadgerNew York Supreme Court · 1857

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Layton v. KirkendallSupreme Court of Colorado · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API