Legal Opinion

Layton v. Kirkendall

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1894PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to the County Court of Mesa County.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Goddard

This action was originally instituted by James A. Kirkendall and Charles S. Kirkendall against James A. Layton, before a justice of the peace, to recover a balance alleged to be due on a contract for the sale or renting of certain pasture lands for pasturing cattle. From a judgment in favor of plaintiffs below an appeal was taken to the county court. The case was there tried to a jury and a verdict rendered *237against defendant for the full amount claimed. There are no written pleadings. It appears from the uncontradicted evidence that the Kirkendalls were the owners of two thirds and one M. R.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jackson v. HammSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
  2. Rio Grande Extension Co. v. CobySupreme Court of Colorado · 1884

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gunnison County v. Board of Assessment AppealsColorado Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. In re Estate of ThomasSupreme Court of Colorado · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API