Trinkle v. Cordisco
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*434The plaintiffs and the defendants, owners of adjoining parcels of property, each claimed, inter alia, title to a triangular strip of property over which the plaintiffs maintained a driveway to their home. The jury determined, inter alia, that the strip was owned by the defendants.
In an action to determine a boundary line, a plaintiff must locate the boundary with a fair degree of certainty (see, 1 Warren’s Weed, New York Real Property, Boundaries, § 4.05 [1]; cf., Sarfaty v Evangelist, 142 AD2d 995). Here, the plaintiffs presented unrebutted expert testimony and documentary evidence that the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cohen v. Hallmark Cards, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Lanza v. WagnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
- Prozeralik v. Capital Cities Communications, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Sarfaty v. EvangelistAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
3Cited by2 opinions
- Crown Fire Supply Co. v. CroninAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Matthews v. GarrettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003