Legal Opinion

Sarfaty v. Evangelist

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 7, 1988PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: We agree with the trial court that defendants established title to the disputed parcel, but base our determination on a different ground. The proof adduced at trial supports the conclusion that defendants acquired title to the disputed triangle by the conveyance from Marshall W. Moore. The primary consideration in the construction of deeds is the intent of the parties (see, Chalmers v Lawrence, 86 AD2d 907; Allen v Cross, 64 AD2d 288, 291) and rules of construction have developed as a means for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Baldwin v. . BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
  2. Sherman v. . KaneNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  3. Allen v. CrossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  4. Prosser v. GouveiaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  5. Lumnah v. RogersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Markstein v. Countryside I, L.L.C.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Sammons v. American Automobile Ass'nWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Curwin v. Verizon CommunicationsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  4. 10 East 70th Street, Inc. v. GimbelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  5. Miller v. SeibtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API