Louisville, Evansville & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Payne

The only error assigned by the appellant, the plaintiff below, upon the record of this cause, is the decision of the court in sustaining the separate demurrers of the appellees for the alleged want of facts, to its complaint.

In its complaint, the appellant, alleged that it was the owner, *184and lawfully entitled to the possession, of certain described personal property; that such personal property had not been taken for a tax, assessment or fine pursuant to any statute, or seized under an execution or attachment against the appellant’s property; that such property had been wrongfully detained by…