Legal Opinion

American National Bank v. Hall

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1924No. 3985PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Judge STAYTON

delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section B.

Judgment against relators having been rendered after a trial by jury and affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals at Amarillo, (250 S. W., 279) they have applied for a writ of mandamus upon the ground, that between the opinion of the latter court and other opinions, cited in their petition, there are conflicts, as to which, under R. S. Art. 1623, certain questions should be certified to the Supreme Court. One of the relators is a banking association which clearly appears to be a stakeholder of the fund in litigation…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Garitty v. RaineyTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Sanders v. BridgesTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  3. American Nat. Bank of Wichita Falls v. HaggertonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  4. Dashiel v. LottTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  5. Smith v. ConnerTexas Supreme Court · 1905

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. WynnTexas Supreme Court · 1957
  2. State v. WynneTexas Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Casparis v. Fidelity Union Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  4. Turner v. CochranCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  5. Coastal Corp. v. GarzaTexas Supreme Court · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API