Legal Opinion
Dashiel v. Lott
Texas Commission of Appeals
Decided October 11, 1922No. 349-3718PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGallagher, J.
The honorable Court of Civil Appeals has made a clear and comprehensive statement of this case, which we adopt, as follows:
“This suit was originally instituted by one Jas. Polk against D. D. Harrigan and plaintiff in error, J. N. Lott, seeking recovery against theim on vendor’s lien notes aggregating $4,500, together with foreclosure of lien on a certain 13%-acre tract situated in an outlying part of the city of San Antonio, Tex. Later defendant in error Mrs. C. L. Dashiel was substituted as plaintiff, she having acquired the notes after they were declared due. In her third amended original…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Smith v. Traders National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1889
- Sanders v. BridgesTexas Supreme Court · 1886
3Cited by21 opinions
- Mason v. PetersonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
- Haile v. HoltzclawTexas Supreme Court · 1967
- Central Nat. Bank of Waco v. LawsonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930
- Smith v. FrostTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
- Ferguson v. American Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1929
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.