Medlock v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
COWART, Judge.
This is another sentencing guidelines departure case.
Defendant was charged, tried, and convicted of unlawful sale or delivery of cannabis 1 and possession of cannabis in excess of 20 grams.2 The trial court imposed a guideline departure sentence for the following summarized reasons:(1) the defendant’s conduct in the instant offense was in blatant disregard of the laws of society;(2) the defendant shows no remorse for his conduct;(3) this offense involved the sale of a controlled substance to inmates of the Correctional Institution;(4) it is inconceivable to this Court that a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. MischlerSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
- Mullen v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Pilgrim v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Lee v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Safford v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Muff v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- State v. ValdesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Medlock v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
- State v. BradyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988