State v. Brady
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
Upon the defendant’s confession of error, the sentences imposed in this case, which departed downward from the sentencing guidelines, are reversed because there is no evidentiary support for either of the two reasons given by the trial court to justify the said departure, see State v. Chesney, 509 So.2d 380, 381 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987); Mitchell v. State, 507 So.2d 686, 688 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); Medlock v. State, 489 So.2d 848, 849 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986), and the cause is therefore remanded to the trial court with directions (a) to allow the defendant, if he chooses, to withdraw his guilty plea to the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. JohnsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
- Mitchell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
- State v. ThomasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
- State v. WilliamsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
- Medlock v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.