Muff v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
COWART, Judge.
This is another sentencing guideline departure case.
“Guideline punishment is not sufficient” was one of the reasons listed by the trial judge for departing upward from the recommended guideline sentence.
This is not a valid reason for departure under Hendrix v. State, 475 So.2d 1218 (Fla.1985). See Medlock v. State, 489 So.2d 848 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986); Safford v. State, 488 So.2d 141 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986); Brown v. State, 487 So.2d 1158 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986); Wilson v. State, 490 So.2d 1360 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986); Scott v. State, 482 So.2d 607 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986); Clark v. State, 481…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Albritton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- Hendrix v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- Hankey v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
- Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Safford v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Bailey v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986