Legal Opinion

Harmston v. City and County of San Francisco

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 10, 2010No. 09-16562PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BYBEE, Circuit Judge:

The district court sanctioned police officer Andrew Cohen and attorney Waukeen Q. McCoy (collectively, “Cohen”) in 2007 for violating the court’s discovery protective order. After the district court remanded the case to state court in 2008, and after the state court entered judgment, Cohen appealed the district court’s sanctions order in 2009. We are first asked to decide whether the remand order was a “final” order for purposes of permitting Cohen to appeal the sanctions order. Concluding that the remand order was final, we then must determine whether the appeal…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Bowles v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Quackenbush v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Laura Flam v. Marshall FlamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  2. Harrison Orr v. PlumbCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  3. Cpc Patent Techs. Pty Ltd. v. Apple, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
  4. Armstrong v. Clarkson CollegeNebraska Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Campbell v. Feld Entertainment, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API