Legal Opinion
Campbell v. Feld Entertainment, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided December 15, 2014No. Case Nos.: 12-CV-04233-LHK, 13-CV-00233-LHKPublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL. SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
LUCY H. KOH, United States District Judge
Plaintiffs Shannon Campbell (“Campbell”) and Mark Ennis (“Ennis”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) have brought a diversity action against defendants Feld Entertainment, Inc. (“FEI”), operator of the Ringling Bros, and Barnum & Bailey Circus (“Circus”); Michael Stuart (“Stuart”); and David Bailey (“Bailey”) (collectively, “Defendants”) for alleged violations of state law and common law torts.
Before the Court are…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Dairl Johnson Claudine Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- House v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Central Bank of Denver, N. A. v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Lawman v. City & County of San FranciscoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2016
- Marentes v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2016
- I.H. ex rel. Hunter v. Oakland School for the ArtsDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2017
- (PS) Warnken v. County of SolanoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
- (PS) Wu v. Dept. of Health and Human ServicesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.