Legal Opinion

Friedline v. Friedline

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 3, 1923No. Appeal, No. 88PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Walling,

This bill in equity was filed to compel the restoration of a deed and bond wrongfully taken from their proper custody. The case was heard upon bill, answer, replication and testimony. In 1919, the defendant, Isaac Friedline, owned and with his wife occupied a fifty-three acre farm in Ligonier Township, Westmoreland County. Owing to age and infirmities they were unable longer to care for themselves or the farm, and, being childless, they arranged with the plaintiffs, Mr. and Mrs. Norman A. Friedline, the former being Isaac’s nephew, to move onto the farm and care…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kanawell v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  2. VanHorn v. Munnell, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lawrence County1891
  3. Diehl v. EmigSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wheatcroft v. Albert Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  2. Chilton's Administrator v. ShelleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  3. Ensminger v. Larkin, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API