Legal Opinion

Jackson, Hunter & Gould Coal Co. v. Holton

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 4, 1941No. 29982PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.

This appeal involves the rights of an intervening claimant and the chattel mortgagee in a replevin action instituted by the latter against the mortgagor and one in actual possession of the property.

The subject of the action was a number of cars of coal in possession of a railroad company, a defendant below. The intervener claimed title by purchase from the mortgagor or, in the alternative, possession as the mortgagor’s factor by reason of its status as consignee under bills of lading issued by the railroad. Plaintiff obtained possession of the coal under the writ and disposed of the same. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wilson Motor Co. v. DunnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  2. Federal National Bank v. LindseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Kirkham v. B. F. Fullerton & SonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Pabst Brewing Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Moody v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Schaefer & Associates, P.A. v. SchirmerCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API