Legal Opinion

Edgar v. K.L.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 18, 1996No. 96-2641PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs in this class action contend that the mental health care system of Illinois violates the Constitution of the United States. With the consent of the parties, the district judge appointed a panel of three experts to investigate the state’s institutions and programs. The panel’s charge permits its members and aides to meet with patients and state employees outside the presence of counsel, for otherwise they could not collect rehable data. Later the panel began to meet in private with the judge, without such a compelling reason. When defendants learned that one of these meetings, which…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. United States v. John M. MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  5. United States v. Frank Peter Balistrieri, Steve Disalvo, and Dennis Librizzi, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. In Re: Kensington International Limited and Springfield Associates, Llc, in Re: D.K. Acquisition Partners, L.P. Fernwood Associates, L.P. And Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, in Re: Usg CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
  2. In the Matter of Jeffrey C. Hatcher, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  3. United States v. CravenCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
  4. Kniatt v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2007
  5. United States v. William K. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API