Legal Opinion
Arkansas Right to Life State Political Action Committee v. Butler
District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Decided December 8, 1998No. 97-5064PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
H. FRANKLIN WATERS, Senior District Judge.
Currently before the court is plaintiffs’ renewed motion for summary judgment and defendants’ response thereto. For the reasons set forth below, plaintiffs’ motion will be granted.
I. BACKGROUND
Much of the background of this case, as well as the legal analysis that follows, has been set out by the court in its previous decisions. Thus, we draw liberally from those opinions.
Plaintiffs commenced this lawsuit to challenge the constitutionality of certain provi sions of Initiated Act I of 1996, popularly known as the “Campaign…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- McIntyre v. Ohio Elections CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- AgriStor Leasing v. FarrowCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. Alaska Civil Liberties UnionAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
- North Carolina Right to Life, Inc. v. LeakeDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2000
- Yes for Life Political Action Committee v. WebsterDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1999
- Majors v. AbellIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
- Herschaft v. New York City Campaign Finance BoardDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.