Herschaft v. New York City Campaign Finance Board
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
AMON, District Judge.
Plaintiff challenges the constitutionality of Section 3 — 03(c)(4)(i) of Title 52 of the Rules of the City of New York and Section 3-703(6) of New York City’s Administrative Code and Charter, and requests a preliminary injunction barring the defendant New York City Campaign Finance Board (the “Campaign Finance Board”) from enforcing the two provisions against him. The defendant cross-moves to dismiss plaintiffs Amended Complaint 1 pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). For the reasons stated herein, plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction is denied…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. City of HialeahSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.