Legal Opinion

Herschaft v. New York City Campaign Finance Board

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided December 8, 2000No. 00 CV 3754 CBAPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

AMON, District Judge.

Plaintiff challenges the constitutionality of Section 3 — 03(c)(4)(i) of Title 52 of the Rules of the City of New York and Section 3-703(6) of New York City’s Administrative Code and Charter, and requests a preliminary injunction barring the defendant New York City Campaign Finance Board (the “Campaign Finance Board”) from enforcing the two provisions against him. The defendant cross-moves to dismiss plaintiffs Amended Complaint 1 pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). For the reasons stated herein, plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction is denied…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. City of HialeahSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API