Legal Opinion
Figueroa v. New York City Housing Authority
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 6, 2000PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara Kapnick, J.), entered November 27, 1998, which, inter alia, denied that part of defendant Housing Authority’s cross-motion seeking summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously modified, on the law, to grant the cross-motion to the extent of dismissing the third and fourth causes of action, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiff’s action seeking damages arising from an alleged wrongful eviction was timely commenced pursuant to Public Housing Law § 157 (2) since the Statute of Limitations was tolled for the 30-day period…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- D'Alessandro v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Torres v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- O'Hara v. BishopAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Gonzalez v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Melendez v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Scott v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- White v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Davis v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Taunus Corp. v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Citadel Estates, LLC v. New York City Housing AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 2013