Legal Opinion

Melendez v. New York City Housing Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 16, 1998PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Sheila Abdus-Salaam, J.), entered January 21, 1997, which denied defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint as time barred, unanimously modified, on the law, to dismiss plaintiffs’ second cause of action, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiffs assert that they were wrongfully terminated from their positions at the Department of Social and Community Services based on false allegations, published in an interview in El Diaro, that they used their employees to engage in partisan politics during working hours. Plaintiffs’ first cause of action…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McCormack v. Port Washington Union Free School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Feraca v. Town of EsopusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  3. Wilder v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ramos v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. Figueroa v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. Adebambo v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API