Legal Opinion
Bolus v. Murphy
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided May 16, 2003PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Senior Judge McCloskey.
Robert C. Bolus, Sr. (Appellant) appeals from the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Lackawanna County (trial court), dated September 24, 2002, sus taining the preliminary objections that were filed by Kevin Murphy (Murphy) and Thomas Gilhooley (Gilhooley) and dismissing Appellant’s quo warranto action. 1 Murphy and Gilhooley shall be collectively referred to as Appellees. We affirm the order of the trial court.
On or about April 12, 2002, Appellant filed a quo warranto private complaint against Appellees, challenging their qualifications as councilmen for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McCaffrey v. Pittsburgh Athletic Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Mayer v. HemphillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Spykerman v. LevySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Carroll Township School Board Vacancy CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- In Re One Hundred or More Qualified ElectorsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Reed v. HARRISBURG CITY COUNCILSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Lueck v. TeutonNevada Supreme Court · 2009
- Fraternal Order of Police, Queen City Lodge No. 10 v. City of AllentownCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Keck v. Bensalem TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Com. of PA ex rel. A.J. Watson, DA v. K.N. CrosbyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.