Legal Opinion
Spykerman v. Levy
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided September 22, 1980No. 173 Misc. Docket 1979PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
NIX, Justice.
We are presented with a consolidated appeal. In Spykerman, Healy, and Matthews v. Levy, petitioners seek a writ *474of prohibition against the Common Pleas Court of Delaware County in order to prevent that court from appointing someone to fill the vacancy on the Board of Supervisors of Chester Township.1 In Hales and Palazzo v. Township of Chester, Spykerman, Pisarek, Walton, Stapleton and Phillips, the appellants appeal to this Court from a temporary restraining order of the Common Pleas Court of Delaware County enjoining them from acting in their capacity as…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Johnson v. Manhattan Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- McNair's PetitionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Carpentertown Coal & Coke Co. v. LairdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Beaver County Building & Loan Ass'n v. WinowichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- State Dental Council & Examining Board v. PollockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Capital Cities Media, Inc. v. TooleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Haynes v. OttleySupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2014
- Reading Anthracite Co. v. RichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- In Re JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- In re Act 147 of 1990Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.