Legal Opinion

In Re One Hundred or More Qualified Electors

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 30, 1996PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CASTILLE, Justice.

The issue raised in this direct appeal is whether appellants have standing to contest the council seat of a public officer through either a quo warranto action or an action in equity. Because we find that appellants, under the circumstances of this case, lack standing to bring either a quo warranto action or an action in equity, we affirm the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County order denying appellants’ petition to declare the council seat of Donald J. Desiderio forfeited and vacant.

The facts giving rise to this appeal are that on October 7, 1985, Donald J.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McCaffrey v. Pittsburgh Athletic Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  2. Commonwealth ex rel. Specter v. MartinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  3. Spykerman v. LevySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Carroll Township School Board Vacancy CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  5. League of Women Voters of Lower Merion & Narberth v. Lower Merion Township Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. In the Interest of L.J.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Commonwealth v. RaineySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Baldwin v. RichardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Commonwealth ex rel. Judicial Conduct Board v. GriffinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Commonwealth ex rel. Corbett v. DesiderioCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API