United States Ex Rel. Loughren v. Unum Group
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
STAHL, Circuit Judge.
Patrick J. Loughren (“Relator”) brought suit under the qui tam provisions 1 of the False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. § 3729 et seq., alleging its violation by Unum Group (“Unum”) and co-defendant Genex Services, Inc. (“Genex”). 2 On appeal, Unum challenges the district court’s denial of its motion for judgment as a matter of law, the court’s exclusion of certain evidence, and the court’s instructions to the jury on the element of scienter. After a thorough review, we affirm the district court’s denial of Unum’s motion for judgment as a matter of law, but find that the…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. GaudinSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Edwin P. Harrison, and United States of America, Party in Interest v. Westinghouse Savannah River CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- Kungys v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Hutcheson v. Blackstone Medical, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- Guilfoile v. ShieldsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. CotterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
- United States Ex Rel. Escobar v. Universal Health Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
- United States Ex Rel. Polukoff v. St. Mark's Hosp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.