Legal Opinion
Sosanie v. Pernetti Holding Corp.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 22, 1971PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
115 N.J. Super. 409 (1971)
279 A.2d 904
EDWARD J. SOSANIE AND MARY SOSANIE, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
PERNETTI HOLDING CORP. AND JOSEPH E. PERNETTI, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.
Decided June 22, 1971.
Mr. Harold Friedman for Plaintiffs (Mr. William A. Kaufmann, attorneys).
Mr. Leo I. McGough for defendants (Messrs. Moser, Roveto & McGough, attorneys).
TRAUTWEIN, J.S.C.
Plaintiffs brought this action for a declaration of the validity of an exercise of a renewal option in a lease and to specifically enforce said renewal. This matter came on under R. 4:67-1(b) on a motion…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- F. B. Fountain Co. v. SteinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
- Sears, Roebuck Co. v. CampSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1938
- American Houses, Inc. v. SchneiderCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
- Goerke Kirch Co. v. Goerke Kirch Holding Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
- Koch v. H. & S. DEVELOPMENT CO.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1964
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Platinum Management v. DahmsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995
- Fletcher v. FrisbeeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
- Simons v. YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Western Savings Fund Society v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Gillman v. Bally Mfg. Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.