Legal Opinion

Bartholomew v. Watson

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 11, 1982No. 80-3237PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALARCON, Circuit Judge:

Appellants Robert Watson, Amos Reed, Hoyt C. Cupp, George E. Sullivan, and T. G. Toombs (hereinafter state appellants) have appealed from the order of the district court awarding attorneys’ fees to appellees Michael C. Bartholomew, Scott M. Baldwin, Earl W. Branch, Louis Chavarria, Stephen C. Chochrek, Robert W. Danielson, Dana B. Robinson, and Ernest Leroy Smith (hereinafter the inmates) in the entire amount requested, pursuant to the Civil Rights Attorney’s Fee Awards Act of 1976. 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (1976).

BACKGROUND FACTS

On June 6, 1973, the inmates filed their…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Hutto v. FinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Newman v. Piggie Park Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Larry Nadeau v. Raymond A. Helgemoe, Warden, New Hampshire State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
  5. New York Gaslight Club, Inc. v. CareySupreme Court of the United States · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Webb v. County Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Twin City Sportservice, Inc. v. Charles O. Finley & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  3. Stella STATHOS, Et Al., Plaintiffs, Appellees, v. Russell E. BOWDEN, Et Al., Defendants, AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
  4. Specialized Tours, Inc. v. HagenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  5. Lummi Indian Tribe, Cross-Appellees v. Wesley C. Oltman, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API