Legal Opinion
Milwaukee County v. Roswitha Peters and U. S. Department of Labor
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided June 1, 1982No. 81-1801PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CUMMINGS, Chief Judge.
In this case Milwaukee County seeks review of the final decision of a Labor Department Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) under the Comprehensive Employment and Training Act (CETA). 1 We have jurisdiction by virtue of 29 U.S.C. § 817 (Supp. II 1978). 2 We affirm both parts of the ALJ’s decision: (1) that six months’ back pay was necessary to redress the CETA violation; and (2) that Milwaukee County, as the CETA prime sponsor, is jointly and severally liable with the CETA employer for payment of the award from non-CETA funds.
Background
Roswitha Peters worked from December 1,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- City of Boston v. Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
3Cited by13 opinions
- Wiggins v. Equifax Services, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1993
- Commonwealth of Kentucky, Department of Human Resources v. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- Action, Inc. v. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary, United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
- City of Chicago v. United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- North Carolina Commission of Indian Affairs v. United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.