Legal Opinion
Cardenas v. Mixcus
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 17, 2003No. SC 16629PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BORDEN, J.
The sole issue in this appeal is whether, when an employer intervenes pursuant to General Statutes § 31-293 (a)1 in an action brought by its employee *316against a third party tortfeasor, offer of judgment interest awarded pursuant to General Statutes § 52-192a2 *317must be based on the amount of the jury verdict, or on the amount of the judgment after apportionment of the damages between the employee and the employer. The named plaintiff, Julio Cardenas,3 appeals4 from the judgment of the trial court denying him offer of judgment interest. The plaintiff claims that, by first…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gurliacci v. MayerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- State v. CourchesneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Frillici v. Town of WestportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Blakeslee Arpaia Chapman, Inc. v. EI Constructors, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Bender v. BenderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Carmel Hollow Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Town of BethlehemSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Dilieto v. County Obstetrics & Gynecology Group, P.C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Monti v. WenkertSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- C. R. Klewin Northeast, LLC v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- In re William D.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.