Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Daddario v. City of Gloucester

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 15, 1952PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

These are two actions of contract, the first by Daddario against the city of Gloucester brought in the Superior Court for Suffolk County, and the second' by the city against Daddario brought in the Superior Court for Essex County. The cases arise out of alleged breaches of a contract made by the city with Daddario for the construction by him of a siphon sewer under the Annisquam Canal in Gloucester. After being consolidated for trial (Lumiansky v. Tessier, 213 Mass. 182) they were tried to a jury in Suffolk County. A verdict in a substantial amount was returned for Daddario as plaintiff in…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Hartmann v. Boston Herald-Traveler Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
  2. Lumiansky v. TessierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  3. Weiner v. D. A. Schulte, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  4. Kinnear v. General Mills, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  5. Reed v. Home Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. DoCanto v. Ametek, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  2. Smith v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1954
  3. Randazzo v. O'BrienMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1984
  4. Gilman v. BrownMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1970
  5. Gurney v. McIntires Dairy, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1972

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API