Legal Opinion

Charney v. Charney

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 27, 1944PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.

The parties are husband and wife. On March 14, 1936, while domiciled in New York, they entered in that State into a written separation agreement, by which the husband agreed to pay his wife $10 a week for her support during her life. Though the parties contracted with each other directly, without the intervention of a trustee (Terkelsen v. Peterson, 216 Mass. 531; Schillander v. Schillander, 307 Mass. 96; Johnson-Foster Co. v. D’Amore Construction Co. 314 Mass. 416, 422), the agreement was valid and enforceable at law and in equity under the law of New York. New York Domestic Relations Law…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Goldman v. GoldmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  2. Winter v. . WinterNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  3. Schmelzel v. SchmelzelNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  4. In Re the Accounting of RhinelanderNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
  5. Garlock v. GarlockNew York Court of Appeals · 1939

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Minot v. MinotMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  2. Callow v. ThomasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
  3. Doe v. DoeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  4. Jurewicz v. JurewiczMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  5. Binder v. BinderMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API