Legal Opinion

O'Conner v. Arnold

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1876PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From the Shelby Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBiddle, J.

The appellees placed an account against the appellant, for merchandise sold and delivered to him, in the hands of Richard Norris, an attorney, for collection. Norris proceeded by suit and recovered judgment against the appellant for four hundred and ninety-seven dollars and thirty-four cents. This is the judgment before us, which the appellant seeks to reverse.

Before suit was brought, while the account was in the hands of Norris for collection, and after it had been presented for payment to the appellant by Norris, the appellant paid to G. D. Henkle, to be credited on the account, one hundred…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Cruzan v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Berry v. AndersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  3. Indianapolis Manufacturing & Carpenters Union v. Cleveland, C., C., & I. Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Miller v. EdmonstonIndiana Supreme Court · 1846
  5. Smith v. SublettTexas Supreme Court · 1866

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Robinson v. AndersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Holliday v. ThomasIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Lucas v. RaderIndiana Court of Appeals · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API