Legal Opinion

United States v. Kenneth Olsen

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 8, 2013No. 10-36063, 10-36064PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FRIEDMAN, Senior District Judge:

Kenneth Olsen was convicted in 2003 of knowingly possessing a biological agent, toxin, or delivery system for use as a weapon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 175. This court affirmed his conviction on direct appeal. See United States v. Olsen, 120 Fed.Appx. 18 (9th Cir.2004). In 2009, Olsen filed a motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, raising a number of grounds for relief. After holding an evidentiary hearing on one of those grounds, the district court denied the motion. This court granted a certificate of…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. United States v. Luke BrugnaraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  2. Timothy Alan Dunlap v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
  3. United States v. WilkinsDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2013
  4. United States v. Joshua LucasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  5. United States v. Cliven BundyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API