Legal Opinion

Rommen v. Empire Furniture Manufacturing Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1911No. 9749½PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Gay, J., entered March 25, 1911, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiif, in an action for personal injuries sustained by the operator of a ripsaw.

1Opinion of the CourtGose, J.

This is a suit to recover damages for personal injuries. A judgment for the plaintiif is challenged by this appeal. The suit is brought under the factory act. The charges of negligence are two in number: (1) the failure of the appellant to install a belt shifter, and (2) its failure to guard its saw. The facts are these: The respondent, a cabinet maker by trade, had his right hand injured and the small finger cut off while operating a ripsaw upon a combination machine used for general cabinet work. There was no belt shifter or other device for shutting off the electric power, other than a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Beltz v. American Mill Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Barclay v. Puget Sound Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Hale v. Crown Columbia Pulp & Paper Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Chicago, Milwaukee & Puget Sound Railway Co. v. TrueWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Laidley v. Wm. Musser Lumber & Manufacturing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1907

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lindblom v. Hazel Mill Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
  2. State v. PhillipsWashington Supreme Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API