Legal Opinion

Beltz v. American Mill Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1905No. 5472PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court, for Chehalis county, Irwin, J., entered July 15,1904, upon granting a nonsuit, in an action for personal injuries sustained by the operator of a saw in attempting to remove sawdust while the saw was in motion.

1Opinion of the CourtRudkin, J.

The defendant owns a sawmill at Aberdeen, and the plaintiff, on the 11th day of August, 1903, was in its employ, operating a re-saw used in the manufacture of lumber. This' re-saw consists of a band-saw which runs upon two large wheels, one above, and the other below, the table used to receive the material to be re-sawed. The lower wheel is stationary, and is located down in the floor of the mill. The upper wheel is adjustable so as to keep the band-saw tight, in case of expansion through heat or other cause. The upper wheel is adjusted by means of weights attached thereto', and hung in a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. American Foundry Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Jennings v. Tacoma Railway & Motor Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Olson v. McMurray Cedar Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Luebke v. Berlin Machine WorksWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Week v. Fremont Mill Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1892

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Cummins v. DufaultWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Engelking v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Shea v. Seattle Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Rawlins v. NelsonWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Ramm v. Hewitt-Lea Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1908

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API